Who Funds My Rep?

Pro-Israel PAC money in Congress, from public FEC filings.

Who Funds My Rep? · The 2026 ballot

Mississippi — 2026 races

5 seats decided on November 3, 2026. Pro-Israel PACs have put $279,972 behind candidates here this cycle and $0 against.

Mississippi Senate

  • Scott Colom (Democrat, $2.4M raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Cindy Hyde-Smith (Republican, incumbent, $3.8M raised)
    received $226,495 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Ty Pinkins (Independent, $98K raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0

Mississippi's 1st district

  • Cliff Johnson (Democrat, $551K raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Trent Kelly (Republican, incumbent, $1M raised)
    received $20,362 · spent for $0 · spent against $0

Mississippi's 2nd district

  • Bennie Thompson (Democrat, incumbent, $771K raised)
    received $5,550 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Ron Eller (Republican, $45K raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0

Mississippi's 3rd district

  • Michael Chiaradio (Democrat, $155K raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Michael Guest (Republican, incumbent, $823K raised)
    received $5,054 · spent for $0 · spent against $0

Also on the ballot: Erik Kiehle (Libertarian)

Mississippi's 4th district

  • Jeffrey Hulum III (Democrat, $29K raised)
    received $0 · spent for $0 · spent against $0
  • Mike Ezell (Republican, incumbent, $990K raised)
    received $22,511 · spent for $0 · spent against $0

All Mississippi members of Congress and their career totals

Candidates from the state's certified ballot as reported by Wikipedia's 2026 election articles, checked against Ballotpedia, state election offices and FEC filings (verified 2026-10-02); each race shows its Democratic and Republican nominees plus any other candidate with at least $25,000 raised or tracked PAC money, up to three. Money is the 2026 election cycle (January 2025 onward) from the tracked pro-Israel PACs, as of 2026-09-30: "received" is direct and earmarked contributions to the campaign; "spent for" and "spent against" are independent expenditures. Money spent against a candidate is shown on its own and never credited to an opponent. Methodology.